A lot is happening over in Taiwan and I’m sorry I haven’t had a chance to write much about it. Recently they have been standing up to Beijing in a dramatic display of independence and defiance. Now, the Taiwan government is proposing legislation to legalize….gay marriages!?

The Taiwanese Government is preparing legislation to legitimise gay marriage.
If the new law is passed it would make Taiwan the first country in Asia to recognise marriages between people of the same sex.

The proposals are part of a Human Rights Basic Law which is due to be debated by Taiwanese legislators before the end of the year.

The proposals are part of a drive to protect basic human rights in Taiwan, according to the presidential office.

They would legalise gay marriage and allow homosexual couples to adopt children.

This is a topic that makes even the most liberal nations squirm. I know Taiwan tends to be more free-thinking than many of its Asian neighbors, but I had no idea they were ready to even consider such controversial measures. It’s not a done deal though:

But several hurdles will have to be overcome before the plans can become law. First, they will need to be approved by the cabinet where there is some opposition, as the Bill also contains controversial provisions to outlaw all forms of capital punishment. Then they would have to be approved by Taiwan’s lawmakers

Based on my experiences in Hong Kong, Singapore, the US and China, I would be truly (and happily) surprised if this were to materialize. Even if it doesn’t, it’s a dramatic step in the right direction and shows us that anything is possible when people are willing to think outside of their usual belief systems.

Link via Silt, who somehow beat me to the punch on this one.

I just got back from the hospital, where I was upset (but not surprised) to learn that the painful shoulder surgery I underwent in July failed. The ultrasound technician said the bicep tendon has split in two and that it would take a grafting procedure (whatever that means) to re-attach it. So I am utterly depressed. If you happen to be a personal friend of mine, I am unplugging my phone in a minute, swallowing a fistful of melatonin to alleviate my jet lag and going to sleep. I may not post again for a day or two, as I go back to Kuala Lumpur tomorrow for two days to teach people how to react during a crisis (something I’m familiar with) and get back Friday night.

A Beijing blogger whom I hold in high regard has a new site up and running. Please take a look.

Update: I wrote this post under the duress of extreme jetlag and sleeplesssness, standing up at a terminal in the Hong Kong airport, and I regret some of my wording. I still think things look terrible in Baghdad and I still can only wonder how we can get out of the mess. But my reference to possible “civil war” was not thought through, and at the time I didn’t realize the slaughter was mainly initiated by foreign terrorists.

I just saw the news about the synchronized bombings in Iraq that have created havoc, death and, according to the reporter, “chaos in Baghdad.” (I am using a free airport service and can’t cut/paste, or I would link it.)

I wanted Saddam out. I think his being out is a wonderful thing for all of us. But I also think that there is now no denying that we are in a quagmire. (Yes, the Q word.) Not on the level of Vietnam, but certainly moving in that direction.

I couldn’t believe what I just read. It makes Bush’s recent PR blitz ring more hollow than ever. Yes, there have been dribs and drabs of good news, but can anyone really wonder why so many now see Iraq as a swamp filled with quicksand?

A big complaint of late is that the media are giving too much attention to the bad news at the expense of the good. That’s typical of journalism, and I’m sure it’s true — but only to a degree. Bad news like today’s simply has to overshadow the “good news,” like more Iraqi children going to school. More Iraqi kids in better schools really is good news, but not good enough to balance the horrific news of the bombings and snipings.

Right now, it looks as though things are only getting worse, with no end in sight. We have to rethink our strategy or face a true civil war in Iraq.

The highest honor. As I mentioned earlier, it’s the “collective farm” of the Mainland bloggers. Be sure to check it out.

As our plane headed for Los Angels Airport on Saturday night, the smell of burning wood suddeny permeated the cabin, and looking out the windows we saw huge red and orange flames licking the sky. It was realy quite an amazing sight, so bright and huge, totally out of control. Minutes later we were told the brush fires were so close to the airport we couldn’t land, and we were off to Las Vegas. Bottom line is that right now many hours later, I am in the Hong Kong airport, waiting for my connection to Singapore, totally zombified. At least this time I got upgraded for the 14-hour LA to HK trip; what a difference an upgrade makes.

Considering how I feel now, I probably won’t get back to writing until very late tonight or tomorrow (Wednesday). It was a great trip, one of the best I have ever had. Maybe even another landmark in a landmark-studded life.

It’s back to Singapore, returning Monday afternoon.

I can see China producing a half-hour special about Mao’s “poetry.” But a 20-part series just about Mao’s maudlin verses? Certainly sounds like overkill to me:

A 20-part television series, “Mao Zedong — A Talented Poet,” is expected to be broadcast later this year, to mark the 110th anniversary of the birth of the late leader of the Communist Party of China.

Mao is widely appreciated as a skillful writer of poems and more than 70 of his works have been published.

The documentary series depicts the life of Mao by explaining his poems, and the CCTV production crew undertook a six-month trekacross tens of thousands of kilometers to trace Mao’s footsteps.

Mao was a great revolutionary idealist and a great poet who had a life-long love for poetry and whose poems reflected his creativity, artistic nature and idealism, said Pang Xianzhi, a noted Chinese researcher on the Party history and Mao’s life.

The only thing great about Mao is the amount of blood on his hands. This certainly underscores the macabre celebration of this murderer continues to flourish in China, as though the Cultural Revolution and the great famine never took place. Can you imagine Germany putting on a 20-part TV series about the beauty and wisdom of Mein Kampf?

Some entrepreneurial bloggers over in the mainland have started a very promising new site, Living in China, that will be of interest to anyone curious about life in the PRC.

In their own words:

It’s basically a meta China blog that features the best blog entries on China for readers who do not have time to surf around the web. The site also includes a mini web-based blog aggregator that shows the latest blog entries from the China Blog community.

They’ve even included a couple of my own posts, so you know it’s good! Check it out.

In Pyongyang, you will never see any cripples — no wheelchairs, no crutches, no mentally ill. If you don’t look fit enough, you’re shipped out to God knows where. It’s all part of the looney government’s attempts to keep the capital and its inhabitants looking good for when visitors drop by. (I no longer have the link to the story about this policy; it was corroborated by my former Beijing co-worker who spent some time in Pyongyang a few years back.)

This type of engineering your society so that it looks a certain way and, of course, engineering the media so they only show nice things, is key to the North Korean mentality (Beijing’s too, though not quite so drastic). So when I first read these lines from the Washington Post, I had to wonder whether some of Dear Leader’s methodology was wearing off on our Dear President:

Since the end of the Vietnam War, presidents have worried that their military actions would lose support once the public glimpsed the remains of U.S. soldiers arriving at air bases in flag-draped caskets.

To this problem, the Bush administration has found a simple solution: It has ended the public dissemination of such images by banning news coverage and photography of dead soldiers’ homecomings on all military bases.

In March, on the eve of the Iraq war, a directive arrived from the Pentagon at U.S. military bases. “There will be no arrival ceremonies for, or media coverage of, deceased military personnel returning to or departing from Ramstein [Germany] airbase or Dover [Del.] base, to include interim stops,” the Defense Department said, referring to the major ports for the returning remains.

Apparently the policy is nothing new, but it’s only this administration that’s embraced it. Back during our little war in Afghanistan, Bush ignored the policy. Now, during an operation that faces a lot more cynicism, criticism and skepticism, it’s in full force.

It is a sign, I think, of how Bush wants to “package” the war in Iraq, and a sign of his insecurity about the whole thing. It’s a branding technique that tells its audience (us) that this war is high-tech and antiseptic; we’ll show you the dazzle, but not the consequences, not the ugly underside, not the grief. (And no, it’s not anywhere near the level of what goes on in North Korea, but it did remind me of NK’s attempting to create its own “reality.”)

Call it what you will, it is still an attempt at mass manipulation and propaganda that should be unacceptable in America.

Update: This is a link to the NK’s policy on the handicapped Scroll down to Public Executions, then 7 grafs down.