SARS revisited? “No bird flu in China”

Thank God the SARS crisis brought about a maturity of China’s political leadership and a new age of transparency.

In the spirit of the 1930s Soviet biologist Trofim Lysenko, China is ignoring science it finds inconvenient. The head of the ministry of agriculture’s veterinary bureau, Jia Youling, has rejected research on bird flu published in the journal Nature last week by Yi Guan and his colleagues at the universities of Hong Kong and Shantou.

The paper concluded from genetic analysis that the H5N1 bird flu killing migratory birds at Qinghai Lake in north-west China had come from southern China. An independent team in Beijing reported similar findings. Chinese officials had claimed that the virus came from another country. Last week Jia told the official Xinhua news service that Guan’s paper “made the wrong conclusion” and “lacks credibility” because birds do not fly to Qinghai from southern China – even though this is a well-known migratory route.

Ominously, Jia added that Guan’s group did not even go to Qinghai or have permission to do the research, and that his lab does not meet safety standards. Yet Guan’s BSL3 lab complies with international standards, and his team collected samples from Qinghai before the government introduced rules last month saying no one could study dead animals or bird flu, or even report an outbreak of animal disease, without permission. “They are trying to close everyone’s lab,” Guan told reporters.

Ah, the joys of progress and reform. The scary thing is, if the scientists are correct, avian flu will make SARS look like a paper cut. If the CCP is actually impeding research and lying about it, they could be endangering the lives of millions.

Via CDT.

The Discussion: 6 Comments

Don’t ever underestimate the importance of face. It’s better to let millions die than to lose it. Just another cute cultural difference.

July 15, 2005 @ 5:49 pm | Comment

AM, that would be a lot funnier if it weren’t so true. (Still, it’s damned funny.)

July 15, 2005 @ 6:54 pm | Comment

Yep, Thats the real threat to Taiwan. Face ya gotta have it!

July 15, 2005 @ 9:43 pm | Comment

As Saint Paul said in his letter to the Corinthians,
“There are in the end three things that endure: Face, Hope and Love, and the greatest of these is Face”
(Well that’s how the Chinese pronounce it….)

July 16, 2005 @ 3:45 am | Comment

As this has become my Karl Popper day (see open thread), here he is again:
“No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man who does not want to adopt a rational attitude.”

July 16, 2005 @ 9:07 am | Comment

Ah yes. I love when politicians discount scientists that are good enough to publish in Nature. Granted, Nature articles are not always perfect, but politicians are NOT the authority to critique – well, maybe Gore, since he was a big science enthusiast, but Bush administration is the perfect example of not knowing its ass from its elbow. When will we learn!?

Sometimes I feel like China and the States are much too similar for their own good. “Axis of Evil” versus “China will strike with Nukes if America interferes” and “No Global Warming” versus “No SARS here… no really”

it’s all too much.

July 16, 2005 @ 10:26 am | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.