Libby gets indicted for lying to the grand jury and Rove “walks” – but not really. Fitz is apparently expanding his investigation and Rove is in no way safe or exonarated (though no doubt a lot of GOP spin doctors will make it seem that he is). In a sense, this is the worst thing for Bush, as it means the angst and questions and rumors will continue while the government operates under an ugly cloud.
October 28, 2005
No, I’m not joking or exaggerating. That is exactly what they are saying, although bizarrely, there is no context, no explanation of why the official is saying these things of where he said them or to whom.
China urged Japan to take action to fulfil its promise on reviewing invasion war, and never do anything more to hurt the feelings of the Chinese people, said a Foreign Ministry spokesman on Thursday.
“The Japanese side should fully realize the seriousness of this matter,” said Kong Quan, adding that Japan should earnestly win trust from the Asian neighbors and international community.
When commenting on Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s plea on his current visit to the Yasukuni Shrine, Kong said the responsibility for the current difficult relations between China and Japan does not lie in China.
A right-wing force in Japan has always beautified the invasion war launched by the Japanese militarism, and refused to admit the crimes of aggression, Kong said.
“Their acts severely hurt the feeling of the people of all Asian victimized countries, and violate the principles in the three political documents between China and Japan,” he said.
Will the foreign minister hold his breath until he turns blue if the Japanese don’t stop hurting his feelings? I can’t help but be reminded of this image.
What are they thinking when they put out idiotic articles like this? All it consists of is an official repeating the tired clichees of how mean Japan is. I’m not saying Japan is or isn’t mean, just that this story isn’t news.
October 27, 2005
I don’t know the history of these islands, so I admit total ignorance and an eagerness to learn from readers. I do know that some of the language the KMT uses in this article calls to mind, ironically, the language another country uses in regard to Taiwan.
On the 60th anniversary of Retrocession Day, the government should not forget about the Diaoyutais (釣魚台) and should continue the fight to regain their sovereignty, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said yesterday.
Making the remarks during the “Sixtieth Anniversary of Retrocession Day: Memorial of the Diaoyutais” ceremony, the Taipei mayor added that the islands belonged to Taiwan and should have been returned along with Taiwan when the Japanese renounced sovereignty over the island.
“The Diaoyutais were listed as part of China’s territory in written statements as early as the Ming Dynasty. How can these islands not be part of our territory? Japan failed to renounce control of them in 1945 and has since claimed sovereignty over the islands. This is called `stealing,'” Ma said.
The ceremony, organized by Taipei City’s Cultural Affairs Bureau at Zhongshan Hall, was designed to raise public awareness of the Diaoyutais.
Maybe Taiwan has an open-and-shut case for claiming the islands as its own. I don’t know. But if Ma is saying the islands were once part of China, if Taiwan isn’t a part of China how can he be saying the islands belong to Taiwan? God, you can get a headache thinking about this.
Well, I wouldn’t say they’re split – judging from the article, most oppose it vehemently, though a few disagree and want to buddy up with the PRC. (After all, Taiwan is just another province of the Motherland.)
In an upscale Beijing restaurant, a youthful real estate developer from Taipei muses ruefully over the possibility of union between China’s communist colossus and his home country.
“When I first came here 18 months ago I thought that if China takes over Taiwan it’s OK,” says Chang Chieh, 24. “But now I think that the Taiwan government cannot allow such a thing to happen. It would be a terrible thing for our people.”
Beijing has been working to convince Taiwanese that “common” language, culture and ethnicity make integration into China an inevitability, and a national duty.
But interviews with Chang and others among the around 300,000 Taiwanese professionals who have come to live in China as a result of thawing relations suggest the gap between the two sides is substantial, going beyond China’s one-party rule and Taiwan’s democracy.
“Taiwanese people think differently from people on the mainland,” Chang says. “In China it’s been a real struggle to survive. So people are a lot tougher here. If you put a Taiwanese child down in China, he’ll be eaten up alive.”
Opinion polls in Taiwan say only about 10 percent of its 23 million people want immediate reunification with China. About 15 percent support formal independence, while the remainder favor maintaining the status quo.
Conversations with Taiwanese in China suggest that 56 years of separation have taken a toll on whatever once existed of a common identity.
Shen Zhi-xing, 35, an architect who came from Taiwan early last year, says a key divergence was the 1966-1976 Cultural Revolution that convulsed China.
She says Taiwan’s insulation from the event meant it preserved its “Chinese culture” while China was destroying its own.
“I don’t even think of myself as Chinese,” she says. “When I return to Taiwan I feel like I have come to a completely different place. The gap is very substantial.”
Vincent Yang, 42, a Taiwanese businessman now based in Shanghai, is also disdainful of talk of a common national identity.
“We really feel that China and Taiwan are different places,” he says. “I don’t see any reason why we should unify.”
Not all Taiwanese here agree.
Liu Jie, a 46-year-old businessman who has lived in China since 2001, thinks the cultural similarities are significant and argues that there can be a successful union between Taiwan and China — although he doesn’t think that can happen soon.
“These things take time,” he said.
Reading that, does it sound like they’re split, or that all but a few are dead set against reunification?
Link via CDT.
This sounds absolutely delightful, but you have to read Chinese. Follow the links.
Read it and weep. What a great essay.
The most unattractive trait of the American empire is American arrogance, which the president embodies and which this war elevated. It is not simply that we have a good system. It is the system everyone else should have. It is the best system, and we are the best people. We can mend rivalries so ancient that they not only predate our nation but the birth of Christ. We will install the leaders we like in a country we scarcely understand, leaders who will either be seen as puppets by their people or who will eventually turn against us. We have been here before.
“In Vietnam we didn’t have the lessons of Vietnam to guide us,” says David Halberstam, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of that war. “In Iraq we did have those lessons. The tragedy is that we didn’t pay attention to them.” Or maybe only our leaders did not. The polls show the American people have turned on this war much more quickly than they did on the war in Vietnam. Of course, they are the ones who pay the price.
Definitely read the whole thing. It’s a classic.
October 26, 2005
Two very short paragraphs clearly demonstrate why Time magazine’s “blog of the year” is run by total wankers. Expect a lot of this kind of wanking from those who were oh-so-self-righteous about obstruction of justice and perjury just a few short years ago.
Via Atrios.
He really is a bad guy. Evil? I can’t say that for sure, but definitely megalomaniacal and ruthless in a very nasty way. Maybe “his intentions were good” – liberty and all that (I’m sure oil never entered his mind) but so were Mao’s when he launched the Great Leap Backward. Most of us have no idea just how serious this is: Cheney was effectively running a shadow government, and Shrub’s antic were just window dressing for something far more insidious.
Dick at the Heart of Darkness
By Maureen Dowd
The New York Times
Wednesday 26 October 2005
After W. was elected, he sometimes gave visitors a tour of the love alcove off the Oval Office where Bill trysted with Monica – the notorious spot where his predecessor had dishonored the White House.
At least it was only a little pantry – and a little panting.
If W. wants to show people now where the White House has been dishonored in far more astounding and deadly ways, he’ll have to haul them around every nook and cranny of his vice president’s office, then go across the river for a walk of shame through the Rummy empire
From the unlinkable Times Select.
Living Hand to Mouth
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
October 26, 2005
The New York Times
Shanghai
You don’t see this every day: A columnist for The China Daily wrote an essay last week proposing that the Chinese consider eating with their hands and abandon chopsticks. Why?
Because, Zou Hanru wrote, “we no longer have abundant forest cover, our land is no longer that green, our water tables are depleting and our numbers are expanding faster than ever. … China itself uses 45 billion pairs of disposable chopsticks a year, or 1.66 million cubic meters of timber, or 25 million full-grown trees.” The more affluent the Chinese become, he added, “the more the demand for bigger homes
Comments